| IR-2007-37, Feb. 20, 2007 WASHINGTON –– The Internal Revenue Service
today identified 12 of the most blatant scams affecting American taxpayers
and warned people not to fall for schemes peddled by scamsters.
This year the “Dirty Dozen” highlights five new scams that IRS auditors
and criminal investigators have uncovered. Topping off the list are
fraudulent refunds being claimed in connection with the special Telephone
Excise Tax Refund available to most taxpayers this filing season. The IRS is
actively investigating instances of this scam involving tax preparers who
are preparing inflated refund requests.
Also new to the Dirty Dozen this year are abuses pertaining to Roth IRAs,
the American Indian Employment Credit, domestic shell corporations and
structured entities.
“Taxpayers shouldn’t let their guard down,” IRS Commissioner Mark W.
Everson said. “Don’t get taken by scam artists making outrageous promises.
If you use a tax professional, pick someone who is reputable. Taxpayers
should remember they are ultimately responsible for what is on their tax
return even if some unscrupulous preparers have steered them in the wrong
direction.”
Involvement in tax schemes leads to problems for scam artists and
taxpayers. Tax return preparers and promoters risk significant penalties,
interest and possible criminal prosecution.
The IRS urges taxpayers to avoid these common schemes:
1. Telephone Excise Tax Refund Abuses: Early filings
show some individual taxpayers have requested large and apparently improper
amounts for the special telephone tax refund. In some cases, taxpayers
appear to be requesting a refund of the entire amount of their phone bills,
rather than just the three-percent tax on long-distance and bundled service
to which they are entitled. Some tax preparers are helping their clients
file apparently improper requests. The IRS is investigating potential abuses
in this area and will take prompt action against taxpayers who claim
improper refund amounts and against the return preparers who help them.
2. Abusive Roth IRAs: Taxpayers should be wary of
advisers who encourage them to shift under-valued property to Roth
Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs). In one variation, a promoter has
the taxpayer move under-valued common stock into a Roth IRA, circumventing
the annual maximum contribution limit and allowing otherwise taxable income
to go untaxed.
3. Phishing is a technique used by identity thieves to
acquire personal financial data in order to gain access to the financial
accounts of unsuspecting consumers, run up charges on their credit cards or
apply for loans in their names. These Internet-based criminals pose as
representatives of a financial institution –– or sometimes the IRS itself ––
and send out fictitious e-mail correspondence in an attempt to trick
consumers into disclosing private information. A typical e-mail notifies a
taxpayer of an outstanding refund and urges the taxpayer to click on a
hyperlink and visit an official-looking Web site. The Web site then solicits
a social security and credit card number. It is important to note the IRS
does not use e-mail to initiate contact with taxpayers about issues related
to their accounts. If a taxpayer has any doubt whether a contact from the
IRS is authentic, the taxpayer should call 1-800-829-1040 to confirm it.
4. Disguised Corporate Ownership: Domestic shell
corporations and other entities are being formed and operated in certain
states for the purpose of disguising the ownership of the business or
financial activity. Once formed, these anonymous entities can be, and are
being, used to facilitate underreporting of income, non-filing of tax
returns, listed transactions, money laundering, financial crimes and
possibly terrorist financing. The IRS is working with state authorities to
identify these entities and to bring their owners into compliance.
5. Zero Wages: In this scam, which first appeared in the
Dirty Dozen in 2006, a Form 4852 (Substitute Form W-2) or a “corrected” Form
1099 showing zero or little income is submitted with a federal tax return.
The taxpayer may include a statement rebutting wages and taxes reported by
the payer to the IRS. An explanation on the Form 4852 may cite statutory
language behind Internal Revenue Code sections 3401 and 3121 or may include
some reference to the paying company refusing to issue a corrected Form W-2
for fear of IRS retaliation.
6. Return Preparer Fraud: Dishonest return preparers can
cause many headaches for taxpayers who fall victim to their schemes. Such
preparers make their money by skimming a portion of their clients’ refunds
and charging inflated fees for return preparation services. They attract new
clients by promising large refunds. Some preparers promote filing fraudulent
claims for refunds on items such as fuel tax credits to recover taxes paid
in prior years. Taxpayers should choose carefully when hiring a tax
preparer. As the old saying goes, “If it sounds too good to be true, it
probably is.” Remember that no matter who prepares the return, the taxpayer
is ultimately responsible for its accuracy. Since 2002, the courts have
issued injunctions ordering dozens of individuals to cease preparing
returns, and the Department of Justice has filed complaints against dozens
of others. During fiscal year 2006, 109 tax return preparers were convicted
of tax crimes and sentenced to an average of 18 months in prison.
7. American Indian Employment Credit: Taxpayers submit
returns and claims reducing taxable income by substantial amounts citing an
American Indian employment or treaty credit. Although there is an Indian
Employment Credit available for businesses that employ Native Americans or
their spouses, there is no provision for its use by employees. In a somewhat
similar scam, unscrupulous promoters have informed Native Americans that
they are not subject to federal income taxation. The promoters solicit
individual Indians to file Form W-8 BEN seeking relief from all withholding
of federal taxation. A recent “phishing” variation has promoters using false
IRS letterheads to solicit personal financial information that they claim
the IRS needs in order to process their "non-tax" status.
8. Trust Misuse: For years unscrupulous promoters have
urged taxpayers to transfer assets into trusts. They promise reduction of
income subject to tax, deductions for personal expenses and reduced estate
or gift taxes. However, some trusts do not deliver the promised tax
benefits. There are currently more than 150 active abusive trust
investigations underway and 49 injunctions have been obtained against
promoters since 2001. As with other arrangements, taxpayers should seek the
advice of a trusted professional before entering into a trust.
9. Structured Entity Credits: Promoters of this newly
identified scheme are setting up partnerships to own and sell state
conservation easement credits, federal rehabilitation credits and other
credits. The purported credits are the only assets owned by the partnership
and once the credits are fully used, an investor receives a K-1 indicating
the initial investment is a total loss, which is then deducted on the
investor’s individual tax return. Forming such an entity is not a viable
business purpose. In other words, the investments are not valid, and the
losses are not deductible.
10. Abuse of Charitable Organizations and Deductions:
The IRS continues to observe the use of tax-exempt organizations to
improperly shield income or assets from taxation. This can occur when a
taxpayer moves assets or income to a tax-exempt supporting organization or
donor-advised fund but maintains control over the assets or income.
Contributions of non-cash assets continue to be an area of abuse, especially
with regard to overvaluation of contributed property. In addition, the IRS
is noticing the return of private tuition payments being disguised as
charitable contributions to religious organizations.
11. Form 843 Tax Abatement: This scam rests on faulty
interpretation of the Internal Revenue Code. It involves the filer
requesting abatement of previously assessed tax using Form 843. Many using
this scam have not previously filed tax returns and the tax they are trying
to have abated has been assessed by the IRS through the Substitute for
Return Program. The filer uses the Form 843 to list reasons for the request.
Often, one of the reasons is: "Failed to properly compute and/or calculate
IRC Sec 83-Property Transferred in Connection with Performance of Service."
12. Frivolous Arguments: Promoters have been known to
make the following outlandish claims: the Sixteenth Amendment concerning
congressional power to lay and collect income taxes was never ratified;
wages are not income; filing a return and paying taxes are merely voluntary;
and being required to file Form 1040 violates the Fifth Amendment right
against self-incrimination or the Fourth Amendment right to privacy. Don’t
believe these or other similar claims. These arguments are false and have
been thrown out of court. While taxpayers have the right to contest their
tax liabilities in court, no one has the right to disobey the law.
IRS Still Watches Scams That Fall Off the List
Five of last year’s Dirty Dozen tax scams rotated off the list for 2007.
While the IRS has seen a decline in the occurrence of some of these scams ––
abusive credit counseling agencies, for example –– other problems, such as
offshore abusive transactions continue to be an area of particular concern
for the agency. The absence of a particular scheme from the Dirty Dozen
should not be taken as an indication that the IRS is unaware of it or not
taking steps to counter it.
How to Report Suspected Tax Fraud Activity
Suspected tax fraud can be reported to the IRS using IRS Form 3949-A,
Information Referral. Form 3949-A is available for download from the IRS Web
site at IRS.gov, or by mail by calling 1-800-829-3676. The completed form or
a letter detailing the alleged fraudulent activity should be addressed to
the Internal Revenue Service, Fresno, CA 93888. The mailing should include
specific information about who is being reported, the activity being
reported, how the activity became known, when the alleged violation took
place, the amount of money involved and any other information that might be
helpful in an investigation. The person filing the report is not required to
self-identify, although it is helpful to do so. The identity of the person
filing the report can be kept confidential. The person may also be entitled
to a reward. |